Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Using a geographical scale-free network to describe relations between people in a city, we explain both superlinear and sublinear allometric scaling of urban indicators that quantify activities or performances of the city. The urban indicator Y(N) of a city with the population size N is analytically calculated by summing up all individual activities produced by person-to-person relationships. Our results show that the urban indicator scales superlinearly with the population, namely, Y(N)∝N(β) with β>1, if Y(N) represents a creative productivity and the indicator scales sublinearly (β<1) if Y(N) is related to the degree of infrastructure development. These results coincide with allometric scaling observed in real-world urban indicators. We also show how the scaling exponent β depends on the strength of the geographical constraint in the network formation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yakubo et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: