Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Two stereotype views exist with respect to recent developments in Dutch archaeology. The first holds that the confrontation with New Archaeology in 1968/69 signalled the beginning of an entirely new period in Dutch archaeology. At that point, Dutch archaeologists were first involved in international theoretical discussions, which they have more or less followed ever since. This resulted in the emergence of counterparts in Dutch archaeology of New (or processual) Archaeology, and later of post-processual approaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jan Slofstra (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: