Why the study?
How do Type A and Type D personality types combine to create new profiles in patients with essential hypertension and acute coronary syndrome, and how do these profiles associate with clinical and psychological indicators?
How do Type A and Type D personality types combine to create new profiles in patients with essential hypertension and acute coronary syndrome, and how do these profiles associate with clinical and psychological indicators?
Combined personality profiling reveals that patients with Type A-Negatively Affected and Type D traits have worse cardiovascular risk and psychological profiles, highlighting the importance of psychological assessment in CVD.
Combined personality profiling may flag higher-risk hypertension and ACS subgroups; leaves open whether targeted psychological interventions improve outcomes.
Many studies have focused on Type A and Type D personality types in the context of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), but nothing is known about how these personality types combine to create new profiles. The present study aimed to develop a typology of Type A and Type D personality in two groups of patients affected by and at risk for coronary disease. The study involved 711 patients: 51.6% with acute coronary syndrome, 48.4% with essential hypertension (mean age = 56.4 years; SD = 9.7 years; 70.7% men). Cluster analysis was applied. External variables, such as socio-demographic, psychological, lifestyle, and clinical parameters, were assessed. Six groups, each with its own unique combined personality profile scores, were identified: Type D, Type A-Negatively Affected, Not Type A-Negatively Affected, Socially Inhibited-Positively Affected, Not Socially Inhibited, and Not Type A-Not Type D. The Type A-Negatively Affected cluster and, to a lesser extent, the Type D cluster, displayed the worst profile: namely higher total cardiovascular risk index, physical inactivity, higher anxiety and depression, and lower self-esteem, optimism, and health status. Identifying combined personality profiles is important in clinical research and practice in cardiovascular diseases. Practical implications are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Steca et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: