PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 2, 2026Ore Geology Reviews0 citationsOpen Access

Rapid and concentrated magmatism and mineralization of rare-metal granites: Evidence from the Limu deposit, South China

View Full Paper
SZShao-Hua ZhangChinese Academy of SciencesHJHehe JiangChinese Academy of SciencesWJWei-Qiang JiChinese Academy of Sciences

Key Points

  • This research aims to establish the precise timing and processes of rare-metal mineralization in the Limu granite deposit.
  • Conducted in situ U–Pb/U–Th–Pb dating on zircon, monazite, and other ore minerals from 19 granite samples.
  • Integrated whole-rock geochemical data from 17 new and 51 previous datasets to analyze granite evolution.
  • Correlated isotopic dating results with geological characteristics across multiple localities in the Limu ore field.
  • Constrained the formation of the Limu granite to 212.6 ± 4.4 Ma–207.8 ± 2.3 Ma, with a peak at approximately 210 Ma.
  • Identified Jinzhuyuan, Laohutou, and Shuiximiao granites as the most evolved; Daqiling and Niulanling as more primitive.
  • Highlighted a short formation interval of ∼5 Myr among separate granite stocks, necessitating reevaluation of magmatic evolution in analogous deposits.

Abstract

Rare metals, including W, Sn, Nb, Ta, and Li, are strategic resources essential for advanced manufacturing, clean energy, and defense technologies. In-situ isotopic dating of ore minerals directly constrains rare-metal mineralization timing, which could provide essential information for ore-forming process. The Limu rare-metal granite is a representative granite-type Nb–Ta deposit in South China and occurs as several small stocks (∼1 km 2 ), including muscovite granite, Li–phengite granite, and zinnwaldite/lepidolite–albite granite. Previous studies proposed a prolonged magmatic evolution from ∼ 240 to ∼ 200 Ma, longer than that of most batholiths, with controversial ages derived from different methods, leaving its precise chronological framework unresolved. Here we conducted in situ U–Pb/U–Th–Pb dating on zircon, monazite, cassiterite, columbite-group minerals (CGM), and wolframite from 19 granite samples collected from seven localities in the Limu ore field: Paoshuiling, Jinzhuyuan, Xiangtanling, Niulanling, Daqiling, Laohutou, and Shuiximiao. The results constrain the formation of the Limu rare-metal granite to 212.6 ± 4.4 Ma–207.8 ± 2.3 Ma, with a peak at approximately 210 Ma. Integration of new whole–rock geochemical data (n = 17), previously published datasets (n = 51), and zircon trace element analyses shows that granites from Jinzhuyuan, Laohutou, and Shuiximiao are the most evolved, whereas those from Daqiling and Niulanling represent more primitive end-members. These results define a precise temporal framework, indicating that the separate stocks formed within a short interval (∼5 Myr) through fractional crystallization and prompting a reevaluation of the magmatic and metallogenic evolution of the Limu rare-metal granite, with broader implications for dating comparable highly fractionated granites and granite-type rare-metal deposits worldwide.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1e726230b38c64201b599bhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2026.107350
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper