Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review reveals key psychosocial determinants influencing prevention behaviors in non-tropical areas, indicating potential for tailored strategies.
Abstract Objectives The global spread of Aedes albopictus, a vector of dengue, chikungunya, and Zika, has caused rising autochthonous cases in non-tropical regions. This review synthesizes evidence on psychological and social determinants of individual preventive behaviours in non-endemic settings. Method Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, PubMed and Web of Science were searched for peer-reviewed quantitative studies published up to January 6, 2026. Eligible studies reported associations between individual-level psychosocial factors (e.g., knowledge, risk perception) and preventive behaviours in adults. Effect sizes from multivariate analyses were converted to correlation coefficients (r) and pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Moderator analyses examined zone type (subtropical vs. temperate) and world region (Asia-Pacific, Europe, United States). Results Of 8,531 unique records screened, 226 studies were included, with 62 in non-tropical settings. Thirteen variables across 39 studies met criteria for meta-analysis. Preventive behaviours were strongly influenced by perceived barriers, perception scores, risk perception, perceived severity, and knowledge about MBDs. The effect of knowledge was stronger in subtropical countries and Asia-Pacific countries compared to temperate countries and the United States. Conclusion Tailored communication strategies in non-endemic regions are essential to support individual adaptation as Aedes albopictus expands. Campaigns should enhance public knowledge of MBDs as well as awareness of individual and collective health risks and highlight simple, effective preventive measures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Delor et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: