Retrospective cohort study develops a model to assess spontaneous abortion risk in ART pregnancies, indicating individualized care.
BACKGROUND: Spontaneous abortion is a prevalent complication in pregnancies achieved through assisted reproductive technology (ART), posing significant risks to both maternal and fetal health. Despite the importance of preventing this outcome, no accurate predictive model for spontaneous abortion currently exists. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed clinical data from 15,723 patients who achieved pregnancy via in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) between December 2015 and February 2021. Patients were stratified into abortion and non-abortion groups based on pregnancy outcomes. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors, which were subsequently incorporated into a nomogram for predicting spontaneous abortion risk in ART patients. RESULTS: Among 15,723 patients who conceived through ART, 2,336 (14.86%) experienced spontaneous abortion, while 13,387 (85.14%) did not. Multivariate logistic regression identified female age (OR 1.050; 95% CI 1.029-1.061; P < 0.001), male age (OR 1.102; 95% CI 1.086-1.115; P < 0.001), follicle-stimulating hormone level (OR 1.044; 95% CI 1.015-1.069; P < 0.001), and anti-Müllerian hormone level (OR 0.891; 95% CI 0.862-0.925; P < 0.001) as independent risk factors for spontaneous abortion. The nomogram demonstrated good predictive performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.746 (95% CI 0.707-0.784) in the derivation cohort and 0.718 (95% CI 0.699-0.737) in the validation cohort. CONCLUSION: Female age, male age, follicle-stimulating hormone level, and anti-Müllerian hormone level are independent predictors of spontaneous abortion in ART-conceived pregnancies. The nomogram model provides an effective and intuitive clinical tool for individualized risk assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fei et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: