Cross-sectional study identifies advanced liver disease prevalence in metabolic dysfunction patients, highlighting risk factors.
BACKGROUND: The majority of the burden of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) exists in primary care; however, the prevalence of severe disease in patients with metabolic dysfunction remains poorly described. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 84 general practices located in Victoria, Australia identified patients with metabolic dysfunction over a 12 month period from the PATRON data repository. At-risk MASH was defined using the Fibrotic NASH Index (FNI) based on laboratory data. Patients needing further liver assessment were defined by FIB-4 ≥ 1.3 (≥ 2.0 if 65+ years) and = < 2.67. Advanced liver fibrosis was defined as a FIB-4 of > 2.67. RESULTS: 110,938 individuals were identified with metabolic dysfunction. Of those with a FNI available (n = 16,586), the prevalence of At-risk MASH was 24.3%. Among those with a FIB-4 available (n = 64,948), 16.3% required further liver assessment, while the prevalence of advanced fibrosis was 4.3%. On multivariate analysis, male sex, type 2 diabetes, and hypertension were associated with At-risk MASH, whereas male sex and type 2 diabetes were associated with advanced liver fibrosis. Socio-economic disadvantage was a risk factor for both At-risk MASH and advanced liver fibrosis. CONCLUSIONS: Significant liver disease was observed in a substantial proportion of patients with metabolic dysfunction within primary care, particularly among patients with type 2 diabetes, supporting the rationale for risk stratification. Associations with socio-economic disadvantage highlight the need for societal and public health policy change to improve liver outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adams et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: