What question did this study set out to answer?

The aim is to analyze the civilizational contest of AI models and propose a framework for Latin American sovereignty.

June 2, 2026Open Access

Geopolitics of AI: Europe, China, the US and Latin America's position

Key Points

The aim is to analyze the civilizational contest of AI models and propose a framework for Latin American sovereignty.
Comparative analysis of European, Chinese, and US AI governance models.
Proposal of the Qualitas Doctrine to assert Latin American sovereignty.
Operational roadmap for 2026-2030 focusing on coordination via Mercosur and the Pacific Alliance.
Articulated the contrasting AI governance models of Europe, China, and the US.
Proposed the Qualitas Doctrine as an ethical standard for Latin America.
Outlined a strategic plan for regional autonomy in AI development.

Abstract

I argue that the geopolitics of artificial intelligence is no longer a technical debate but a civilisational contest between three models —the European rights-based model (EU AI Act), the Chinese stability-based model (BSL standards) and the US innovation-based model (NIST AI RMF). My thesis: Latin America cannot be the agentic colony of any of them. This whitepaper articulates a comparative analysis of the three regimes and proposes the Qualitas Doctrine as an ethical matrix for a coordinated Latin American agentic sovereignty via Mercosur and the Pacific Alliance, within the framework of Industry 6.0 and the AI Peoples. I deliver an operational roadmap for 2026-2030.

Read Full Paperexternally

KI fragen

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chris Meniw (Sat,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1e72e830b38c64201b6120 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20469912

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

KI fragen

Bookmark

View Full Paper