Experimental study develops a reliable protocol for propagating Alhagi maurorum, highlighting its medicinal importance.
In vitro propagation of Alhagi maurorum (Fabaceae)Mustafa CUCE 1ORCID: 0000-0001-7406-171X1 Department of Food Technology, Şebinkarahisar School of Applied Sciences, Giresun University, 28400 Giresun, TürkiyeAbstractPurpose: In this study, a contribution was made to a reliable and reproducible in vitro propagation protocol of the rare plant species Alhagi maurorum, which belongs to the Fabaceae family and is of medicinal importance.Method: Mature seeds were used as the initial material. In germination studies, MS medium without any plant growth regulator and MS containing 1.0 mg L-1 GA3 were preferred as the basic medium. At the end of the germination culture period (4 weeks), MS medium supported with 1.0 mg L-1 GA3 was found to be superior with 60% germination success. In shoot multiplication studies, nodal segments obtained at the end of the 4th subculture were used as explants, and MS basal medium was tested by combining 6-BA, kinetin, 2iP, zeatin and TDZ (1.0 mg L-1 separately with IBA (0.1 mg L-1).Findings: The highest mean values per explant for shoot number (4.75), node number (7.50), fresh weight (0.985 g), and dry weight (0.1171 g) were obtained from MS medium containing zeatin + IBA. MS medium supplemented with kinetin + IBA reached the highest mean shoot length with 69.26 mm. In terms of root induction, the highest rooting percentage (90.3%) was obtained in MS media enriched with 1.0 mg L-1 IBA after 4 weeks. This concentration of IBA yielded the highest root number and root length with 5.86 and 38.80 respectively, in MS medium. Rooted plants were initially acclimatized in a climate chamber and then carefully transferred to greenhouse conditions.Conclusion: This propagation method can be considered for ex situ conservation and propagation of rare plant species of medicinal value.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mustafa Cüce (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: