Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates behavioral integrity in large language models, suggesting improved assessment under stress.
Existing large language model (LLM) evaluation frameworks address factual accuracy and single-turn instruction-following but lack systematic methods for assessing behavioral integrity under sustained adversarial pressure, multi-turn memory coherence, and reasoning fidelity across ethically and symbolically complex domains. This work introduces Xyraiq™, an open benchmark architecture that addresses these gaps through three integrated contributions. First, a modular Stress-Tier Engine escalates prompt complexity across defined behavioral thresholds, paired with a Session Orchestrator that maintains multi-turn context integrity across extended evaluation windows. Second, role-modular Persona Packs spanning professional, legal, executive, and spiritual-reasoning domains expose failure modes invisible to single-persona or single-turn regimes, detected by a Failure-Mode Detector layer tracking hallucination drift, ethical boundary erosion, and symbolic reasoning degradation across session state. Third, the Stress Signature — a hash-based cryptographic fingerprint encoding stress tier, persona context, failure events, and scoring outcomes per session — provides tamper-evident, institution-independent audit provenance not present in any current public benchmark. Xyraiq™ aligns with EU AI Act auditability requirements (Art. 53(1)) and is designed as governance infrastructure for behavioral accountability in high-stakes deployed AI systems. The benchmark is released as an open core under Apache 2.0, with premium persona suites licensed separately. This record establishes a dated public origination claim for the architecture, Stress Signature methodology, and IP claim structure at pre-provisional filing stage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomas Roshan George (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: