Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates trunk control's role in hand function and daily living activities in children with CP, suggesting assessment improvements.
Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the impact of trunk control on hand function, daily living activities, and quality of life in children with hemiparetic and diparetic Cerebral Palsy (CP). Methods: We included 46 ambulatory children with CP classified at Gross Motor Function Classification System levels I-III. Children were divided into two groups based on the median Trunk Control Measurement Scale (TCMS) score (42.50): those with higher trunk control (Group 1, n = 23) and those with lower trunk control (Group 2, n = 23). We evaluated their hand function using 9-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT), activities of daily living (ADLs) using Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM), and quality of life using Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL). Results: Children with higher trunk control demonstrated significantly better 9-HPT dominant hand function (p=0.005) and higher scores in WeeFIM (p=0.001) compared to those with lower trunk control. Moderate to low positive correlations were found between all TCMS parameters and WeeFIM (r=0.455 to 0.568, p<0.01), while 9-HPT dominant hand function showed moderate to low negative correlations with TCMS parameters (r=–0.422 to –0.601, p<0.01). No significant associations were observed with PedsQL parameters or 9-HPT non-dominant hand function (p>0.05). Conclusion: Impaired trunk control was associated with dominant hand function and ADLs, but not with non-dominant hand function or quality of life. Considering its relationship with hand function and ADLs, trunk control should be incorporated into the assessment process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Müsevitoğlu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: