Randomized trial investigates automated public opinion extraction in municipal documents, suggesting improved decision-making.
Oslo Municipality seeks to automate the extraction of public opinion from large volumesof unstructured hearing documents to enhance data-driven decision-making in urban devel-opment. While the municipality’s ”AI Factory” initiative has successfully implemented sum-marization tools, these fail to provide the structured, quantitative data required to measure thedistribution of support and opposition across policy topics. This project investigates the feas-ibility of implementing Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis (ABSA) to bridge this gap within theconstraints of a low-resource, privacy-sensitive public sector environment.Through a Structured Literature Review (N = 26), this study maps the transition in the state-of-the-art from discriminative classifiers to Generative AI and structure-aware architectures.Concurrently, an Exploratory Data Analysis on a pilot dataset of municipal texts (N = 63)identifies a critical ”Span Ambiguity Gap”: while human annotators struggle to agree on exacttext boundaries for bureaucratic phrases (κ = 0.21), they exhibit high reliability in identifyingsemantic categories (κ = 0.93).These findings demonstrate that standard extraction pipelines are allegedly ill-suited forthe bureaucratic register. Consequently, this report proposes a strategic pivot to Aspect Cat-egory Sentiment Analysis (ACSA). The study concludes with a proposal for a subsequent Mas-ter’s Thesis centered on a Teacher-Student framework, which utilizes Large Language Models(LLMs) to generate synthetic training data (”Inverse Generation”). This approach aims to en-able the training of capable, privacy-compliant local models, effectively solving the ”Cold Start”data scarcity problem while bypassing the inherent ambiguity of manual span annotation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sebastian Småland (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: