Why the study?
Does iloprost added to t-PA improve thrombolysis and prevent reocclusion in a canine model of coronary thrombosis?
Does iloprost added to t-PA improve thrombolysis and prevent reocclusion in a canine model of coronary thrombosis?
In a canine model, adding iloprost to t-PA paradoxically decreased thrombolytic efficacy and worsened reocclusion, likely due to reduced plasma t-PA concentrations.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Iloprost addition to t-PA impairs thrombolysis in canines; leaves open relevance to human coronary thrombosis.
Platelets play an important role in the formation of a coronary thrombus and reocclusion after thrombolysis. Therefore, we examined the thrombolytic potential of concomitant intravenous administration of potent platelet inhibitor iloprost, a prostacyclin analogue, with tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA; n = 8) and t-PA alone (n = 9) in dogs with an electrically induced occlusive coronary artery thrombus. t-PA (0.75 mg/kg) was given over 20 minutes, and iloprost (4 micrograms/kg) was given over 40 minutes. Reperfusion rate was 63% (five of eight dogs) in the t-PA plus iloprost group and 67% (six of nine dogs) in the t-PA alone group (p = NS). The time to thrombolysis (or reperfusion) in the t-PA plus iloprost group was almost twice as great as in the t-PA alone group (33.0 +/- 13.3 vs. 18.5 +/- 6.7 minutes, mean +/- SD, p less than 0.02), and the duration of reperfusion was much shorter (3.4 +/- 1.8 vs. 39.3 +/- 17.4 minutes, p less than 0.005). Peak coronary artery blood flow after reperfusion in the t-PA plus iloprost group was also less (20 +/- 17 ml/min) than in the t-PA alone group (58 +/- 21 ml/min, p less than 0.005). Reocclusion occurred in all dogs given t-PA with iloprost despite potent synergistic platelet inhibitory effects of t-PA and iloprost, whereas four of six dogs given t-PA alone reoccluded. Neither regimen exerted a significant beneficial effect on regional myocardial shortening during coronary reperfusion. Plasma levels of t-PA were lower when iloprost was given with t-PA (1,022 +/- 360 vs. 1,459 +/- 270 ng/ml in t-PA alone group, p less than 0.05). The detrimental effects of iloprost identified in this study may relate to the reduction in plasma t-PA concentrations by its degradation in the liver caused by the prostacyclin analogue iloprost.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nicolini et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: