Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To quantify the magnitude of the risk for port/extraction site recurrence of laparoscopically resected colon cancer in a defined study population. METHODS: The data from a prospective laparoscopic bowel surgery registry was used to identify cases of colon cancer that were resected laparoscopically, with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. A questionnaire was sent to the surgeons who performed the procedures. RESULTS: A total of 252 cases were identified from the registry. Questionnaires were returned in 208 of those cases, a response rate of 82.5%. Three cases of port or extraction site recurrence were noted, two of them associated with diffuse peritoneal carcinomatosis. All the patients had a Dukes' stage C tumor at the time of initial surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of port/extraction site recurrence following laparoscopic colon cancer surgery is low. All the recurrences were in patients with Dukes' stage C tumors, and there was diffuse peritoneal carcinomatosis in two of the three cases, suggesting that port/extraction site recurrence may be attributable to the advanced nature of the disease rather than the laparoscopic technique. Longer follow-up and more cases are required to confirm these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
José Manuel Ramos (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: