Multi-label learning aims at assigning a set of appropriate labels to multi-label samples. Although it has been successfully applied in various domains in recent years, most multi-label learning methods require sufficient labeled training samples, because of the large number of possible label sets. Co-training, as an important branch of semi-supervised learning, can leverage unlabeled samples, along with scarce labeled ones, and can potentially help with the large labeled data requirement. However, it is a difficult challenge to combine multi-label learning with co-training. Two distinct issues are associated with the challenge: (i) how to solve the widely-witnessed class-imbalance problem in multi-label learning; and (ii) how to select samples with confidence, and communicate their predicted labels among classifiers for model refinement. To address these issues, we introduce an approach called Multi-Label Co-Training (MLCT). MLCT leverages information concerning the co-occurrence of pairwise labels to address the class-imbalance challenge; it introduces a predictive reliability measure to select samples, and applies label-wise filtering to confidently communicate labels of selected samples among co-training classifiers. MLCT performs favorably against related competitive multi-label learning methods on benchmark datasets and it is also robust to the input parameters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xing et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: