• Living labs are deployed widely but their pragmatic nature hinders impact evaluation. • Impact evaluation can be made applicable to ‘fuzzy’ innovation tools such as living labs. • This impact evaluation indicates their contribution to significant economic effects for participants. • A number of methodological recommendations are made for follow-up evaluations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ballon et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: