This study analyses the eects of ftur types of collaborative activities on the R&D pelformance of service SMEs in the context of open innovation: in-house R&D (non-collaboration), technology acquisition, R&D collaboration, and networking. For this, the study employs data envelopment analysis, a power tool that uses multiple inputs and outputs to measure the relative efficiency of collaborative activities of service SMEsfir R&D. The results indicate that technology acquisition is the most efficient type of collaboration for R&D of service SMEs. More specifically, in-house R&D, technology acquisition, and Re9-D collaboration are positively related to product/service innovation, patenting activity, and process innovation, respectively. However, networking is not significantly related to any three types of R&D performance. In addition, the service SME1 strategicficus did not match their strategic purposes, suggesting a need fir adjusting their collaborative activities. The results have important implications for managers and policy-makers interested in facilitating open innovation in service SMEs through various collaborative activities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suh et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: