Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
ranged from 40. 33 ± 5. 13 to 425 ± 8. 00 mg/L; 12.34 ± 0.11 to 188 ± 7.07 mg/L; 48.00 ± 0.83 to 915. 57 ± 1. 27 mg/L; 1.56 ± 1.01 to 66.50 ± 6.36 mg/L; 0.15 ± 0. 08 to 42.83 ± 11.43 mg/L; 20.50 ± 10.61 to 77.50 ± 17.68 mg/L; and 0.35 ± 0.33 to 37.95 ± 0.92 mg/L, respectively. The average concentrations of Zn ranged (0.048 ± 0.037 to 0.318 ± 0.158 mg/L), Cr (0.012 ± 0.007 to 0.203 ± 0.199 mg/L), Cd (<0.014 ± 0.0007 to 0.02 ± 0.001 mg/L) and Pb (0.031 ± 0.008 to 0.124 ± 0.034 mg/L). The comprehensive water pollution index values varied from 0.84-13.32, indicating that at all sampling sites (except for sampling site S1), the river water was heavily polluted (CPI >2.01). Heavy metal pollution index values further demonstrated potential environmental and public health implications. The principal component analysis revealed a total of 88.99% variation in the dataset, mainly contributed by organic matter, nutrients, dissolved salts, and trace metals that originated from anthropogenic sources. Contamination of the river water has impaired its suitability for urban agriculture, aquaculture, livestock drinking, and recreational purposes. Thus, improving the river water quality is recommended to mitigate potential adverse effects and promote sustainable use of water resources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mekuria et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: