Why the study?
An aberration correction algorithm was recently implemented to improve image quality in echocardiography, but its correlation with objective metrics and its impact on image quality and chamber quantification required evaluation.
Does an aberration correction algorithm improve image quality and affect chamber quantification in adult patients undergoing transthoracic echocardiography?
Does an aberration correction algorithm improve image quality and affect chamber quantification in adult patients undergoing transthoracic echocardiography?
Aberration correction in echocardiography significantly improves subjective image quality but does not significantly alter quantitative measurements of chamber size or strain.
Improves subjective image quality without altering chamber quantification; leaves open routine adoption pending prospective studies.
Aims To improve image quality (IQ) in echocardiography, an aberration correction (AC) algorithm has recently been implemented in commercial scanners. We aimed to study (i) the correlation of a subjective IQ-score and an objective IQ-metric [global image coherence (GIC)], (ii) if AC improved IQ; (iii) if AC affected average values and interobserver agreement of left ventricular (LV) size, LV longitudinal strain, and left atrial (LA) volume. Methods and results From 50 adult patients, where 45 (90%) had cardiovascular disease, unprocessed image data (channel data) were acquired from six standard transthoracic views. The data were processed with and without AC, resulting in 300 pairs of cine-loops. The cine-loops were randomly presented one-by-one to two blinded raters experienced in echocardiography. Both raters scored IQ subjectively from 1 (poor) to 4 (very good) and quantified LV dimensions, volumes and longitudinal strain, and LA volume. IQ-score correlated with GIC, Spearman rho 0.72, P < 0.001. AC improved median IQ-score from 2.5 to 3.0 (Wilcoxon signed rank: P < 0.001). The differences in average values of LV size, LV longitudinal strain, or LA volume with and without AC were not statistically significant and numerically minimal. Measured by intraclass correlation, interobserver agreement of these values was not significantly affected by AC. Conclusion Image quality-score strongly correlated with GIC. Aberration correction improved IQ. However, AC did not lead to statistically significant changes in average values or interobserver agreement of LV size, LV longitudinal strain or LA volume quantification. Likely, the major benefit of AC is enhanced visualization of anatomical details.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Berg et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: