Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Recent research has found that men trade stocks more frequently than women and receive a lower price as a result. The behavioral finance literature attributes this greater trading activity to men's overconfidence. Women's lack of overconfidence and past agricultural economics research suggest the possibility that women may be better at marketing grain than men. This article uses actual transactions of farmers marketing wheat and also finds that men trade more often than women. Women also sell two weeks later in the marketing year. There is no direct effect of gender on price received, but by storing longer women receive 1.4 cents/bushel less than men, on average. In contrast to the arguments in previous research, we argue that men's greater number of trades can be better explained by men enjoying trading rather than by overconfidence.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Cunningham et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1e89407f6e8bbb23690e6f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2007.00225.x
Lewis T. Cunningham
B. Wade Brorsen
Oklahoma State University
Kim B. Anderson
Oklahoma State University
Agricultural Economics
Oklahoma State University
Eduardo Mondlane University
Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: