In this paper, we investigate the performance of OLSR and AODV protocols in a VANET crossroad scenario. The mobility patterns of vehicles are generated by means of CAVENET (Cellular Automaton based Vehicular Network) and as communication protocol simulator, is used NS3(Network Simulator 3). For the simulations, we used IEEE802.11p standard, TwoRayGroundPropagationLossModel and sent multiple CBR flows over UDP between ten pairs source-destination. We use Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR), throughput and delay as evaluation metrics. We compared the performance of both protocols and the simulation results shows that for big values of transmission rates, OLSR performs better than AODV. For small transmission rates, the delay is less than 0.1sec and both protocols can be used for real time applications such as safety applications. For big values of transmission rate, the delay is higher than 1 sec and these protocols can be used for applications that tolerate this delay such as streaming and entertainment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Spaho et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: