Why the study?
Does a noninvasive apparatus quantifying central aortic pressure changes (dP/dt) accurately rule out acute coronary syndrome in patients presenting to the emergency department with acute chest pain?
Does a noninvasive apparatus quantifying central aortic pressure changes (dP/dt) accurately rule out acute coronary syndrome in patients presenting to the emergency department with acute chest pain?
Noninvasive measurement of central aortic pressure changes (dP/dt) shows high sensitivity and negative predictive value, potentially aiding in ruling out acute coronary syndrome and preventing unnecessary hospitalizations.
May support ruling out ACS via noninvasive dP/dt in ED chest pain; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before adoption.
Definitive diagnosis in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain is difficult due to limitations of the electrocardiogram (ECG) as the primary assessment tool. Most patients presenting with chest discomfort have a nonischemic ECG and biomarkers of myocardial necrosis within normal limits. Because of the limitation of initial risk stratification tools, many patients who do not actually have acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are admitted to hospital. The current study describes a new, noninvasive apparatus that quantifies central aortic pressure changes (dP/dt), an established indicator of myocardial contractility. We hypothesize that a higher dP/dt occurs in non ischemic chest pain than during ischemic chest pain. This appears to be a result of reduced myocardial contractility during ischemia, whereas chest pain of non cardiac origin increases dP/dt by the stress of the pain itself. The study follows 102 patients presenting at the ED with acute chest pain. In 55 patients, the device indicated chest pain to be of non cardiac origin (dP/dt index above threshold value of ≥150). Of these 55, negative ECG and myocardial enzyme dynamics ruled out coronary origin during the first twenty-four hours after admission (sensitivity 93%, negative predictive value 98% specificity 61%, positive predictive value 28%, accuracy 66%). Initial findings indicate that adding noninvasive dP/dt measurements to the classical triage of chest pain in the ED could help prevent unnecessary hospitalization in a substantial number of patients with low probability for ACS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2006 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: