Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Working in Chemical Biological (CB) protective equipment causes thermoregulatory strain by restricting evaporative cooling. We quantified which impermeable ancillary items [gloves(G), body armour liner(BAL), respirator(R) and overboots(OB)] imposed the greatest and the least thermoregulatory strain through restricting evaporative cooling. The study was a five-condition repeated-measures design with male volunteers (n = 13) who stepped intermittently with recovery periods in a desert-like environment (40.5 °C, 20% rh). Conditions varied in the ensemble worn, with a matched weight secured to the area when an item was not worn: CON(CB suit plus all items), NR(no R), NBAL(no BAL [170g liner]), NG(no G) and NOB(no OB). The greatest reduction in thermoregulatory strain compared with CON occurred in NG when the rise of rectal temperature was attenuated by 0.37 °C.hr−1 (p < .001), extending tolerance time by 21.3% (p < .05) and improving perceived thermal comfort. The least improvement occurred for NOB. It is recommended that the G permeability be examined further.Practitioner summary: Thermoregulatory strain was quantified when wearing impermeable protective equipment. The thermal burden of intermittent exercise in desert-like environments was best alleviated by removing gloves compared to removing a respirator, overboots or body armour liner. Reducing the evaporative resistance of materials used for such kit, particularly gloves, should be investigated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Godsmark et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: