The problem discussed herein is whether familiar static (unchanging) and dynamic (changing) influences on dissent can interact, resulting in quite unfamiliar effects on dissent and justifying a synthesis of separate static and dynamic theories. The argument is that such influences can interact even in conventional ways in a spatiotemporal matrix, altering one another's effects unexpectedly (given current theories) on all phases of dissent from initial motivation to eventual diffusion; a tentative theoretical synthesis is thus offered. Implications include greater anticipatory adaptation to dissent by governments, renewed optimism for broad-gauge and unified theory, and reinterpretation of organized complexity's import for dissent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
CRAIG McCAUGHRIN (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: