Why the study?
The optimal time to restart direct oral anticoagulants for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation after traumatic intracranial hemorrhage is unknown, requiring physicians to balance recurrent hemorrhage against ischemic stroke risks.
What are the rates of recurrent hemorrhage and stroke, and factors influencing the resumption of DOACs in patients with NVAF after traumatic intracranial hemorrhage?
What are the rates of recurrent hemorrhage and stroke, and factors influencing the resumption of DOACs in patients with NVAF after traumatic intracranial hemorrhage?
Holding DOACs for approximately one month after traumatic intracranial hemorrhage in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation appears to have a low stroke rate, though age >80, high injury severity, and hemorrhage expansion often lead to indefinite withholding.
May support DOAC resumption ~30 days post-tICH in select survivors; leaves open optimal timing and selection pending prospective data.
Background: The optimal time to restart direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) after traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (tICH) is unknown. Physicians must weigh the risk of recurrent hemorrhage against ischemic stroke. We investigated rates of stroke while holding anticoagulation, hemorrhage after anticoagulation resumption, and factors associated with the decision to restart anticoagulation. Methods: Patients presenting to our level I trauma center for tICH while on a DOAC for NVAF were retrospectively reviewed over 2 years. Age, sex, DOAC use, antiplatelet use, congestive heart failure, hypertension, age, diabetes, previous stroke, vascular disease, sex score for stroke risk in NVAF, injury mechanism, bleeding pattern, Injury Severity Score, use of a reversal agent, Glasgow Coma Scale at 24 hours, hemorrhage expansion, neurosurgical intervention, Morse Fall Risk, DOAC restart date, rebleed events, and ischemic stroke were recorded to study rates of recurrent hemorrhage and stroke, and factors that influenced the decision to restart anticoagulation. Results: Twenty-eight patients sustained tICH while on a DOAC. Fall was the most common mechanism (89.3%), and subdural hematoma was the predominant bleeding pattern (60.7%). Of the 25 surviving patients, 16 patients (64%) restarted a DOAC a median 29.5 days after tICH. One patient had recurrent hemorrhage after resuming anticoagulation. One patient had an embolic stroke after 118 days off anticoagulation. Age >80, Injury Severity Score ≥16, and expansion of tICH influenced the decision to indefinitely hold anticoagulation. Conclusion: The low stroke rate observed in this study suggests that holding DOACs for NVAF for 1 month is sufficient to reduce the risk of stroke after tICH. Additional data are required to determine optimal restart timing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ghenbot et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: