Why the study?
Do angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors improve endothelial function in patients with cardiovascular risk?
Do angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors improve endothelial function in patients with cardiovascular risk?
ACE inhibitors like ramipril may provide cardiovascular benefits beyond blood pressure lowering by improving endothelial dysfunction.
Supports endothelial effects in ACE inhibitor selection for at-risk patients; leaves open confirmation in prospective outcome trials.
Endothelial cells are strategically located between the circulating blood and the vascular smooth muscle. Through release of numerous vasoactive substances, they are crucially involved in regulating the functions of vascular smooth muscle and circulating blood cells. Important endothelium-delivered vasodilators include prostacyclin, bradykinin, endothelium-derived hyperpolarising factor, and nitric oxide. Nitric oxide inhibits cellular growth and migration, and acts in concert with prostacyclin to exert potent antiatherogenic and antithrombotic effects. These effects are counterbalanced by endothelial vasoconstrictors, such as reactive oxygen species, endothelin-1, and angiotensin II, which exert pro-thrombotic, inflammatory, and growth-promoting properties. Cardiovascular risk factors cause cardiovascular disease by causing endothelial dysfunction; thus, modern therapeutic strategies focus on preserving or restoring endothelial integrity. In addition to their role in inhibiting the renin-angiotensin system, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors prolong the half-life of bradykinin and stabilize the bradykinin receptor linked to formation of nitric oxide. Chronic ACE inhibition improves endothelial function in patients with cardiovascular risk. This may explain why patients treated with ACE inhibitors experience a greater cardiovascular benefit than is attributable to the decrease in blood pressure. Whether and to what degree improvement of endothelial dysfunction translates into clinical benefits for patients with cardiovascular disease remains to be determined.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Frank Enseleit (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: