Key result
High-dose atorvastatin significantly reduced the incidence of peripheral artery disease (HR 0.70) compared with usual-dose simvastatin in patients with a history of myocardial infarction.
Why the study?
Does atorvastatin 80 mg/day reduce the incidence of peripheral artery disease compared to simvastatin 20-40 mg/day in post-myocardial infarction patients?
RCT (n=8,888)
Open-label, blinded outcome assessment
Randomized
Yes
Does atorvastatin 80 mg/day reduce the incidence of peripheral artery disease compared to simvastatin 20-40 mg/day in post-myocardial infarction patients?
Hazard Ratio: 0.7 (95% CI 0.53–0.91)
Absolute Event Rate: 2.2% vs 3.2%
p-value: p=0.007
High-dose atorvastatin (80 mg/day) is superior to usual-dose simvastatin (20-40 mg/day) in preventing incident peripheral artery disease in post-myocardial infarction patients.
Supports preferring high-dose atorvastatin over usual simvastatin to prevent PAD post-MI; extends intensive statin benefits in secondary prevention.
OBJECTIVES: To study whether high-dose versus usual-dose statin treatment reduces the incidence of peripheral artery disease (PAD) and what is the effect of high-dose statin treatment on cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcome in patients with PAD. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the Incremental Decrease in End Points Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering trial, 8888 post-myocardial infarction patients were randomised to high-dose or usual-dose statin therapy (atorvastatin 80 mg/day vs simvastatin 20-40 mg/day). We investigated the effect of high-dose versus usual-dose statins on the pre-specified outcome PAD incidence, and additionally performed a posthoc analysis of the efficacy of high-dose statins in reducing CVD risk among patients with PAD. During a median follow-up of 4.8 years, 94 patients (2.2%) receiving atorvastatin and 135 patients (3.2%) receiving simvastatin developed PAD (HR=0.70, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.91; p=0.007). The risk of major coronary events was almost twofold higher in patients with PAD at baseline, but was no longer significant after adjusting for the adverse cardiovascular risk profile. In PAD patients, major coronary events occurred in fewer patients in the atorvastatin group (14.4%) than in the simvastatin group (20.1%), but the difference did not reach statistical significance. (HR=0.68, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.11; p=0.13). Atorvastatin treatment significantly reduced overall cardiovascular (p=0.046) and coronary events (p=0.004), and coronary revascularisation (p=0.007) in these patients. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose statin therapy with atorvastatin significantly reduced the incidence of PAD compared with usual-dose statin therapy with simvastatin. Patients with a history of PAD at baseline were at higher risk of future coronary events and this risk was reduced by high-dose atorvastatin treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00159835 (URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00159835).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stoekenbroek et al. (2015) conducted an RCT in Post-myocardial infarction (n=8,888). Atorvastatin vs. Simvastatin 20-40 mg/day was evaluated on Incident peripheral artery disease (PAD) (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.91, p=0.007). High-dose atorvastatin significantly reduced the incidence of peripheral artery disease (HR 0.70) compared with usual-dose simvastatin in patients with a history of myocardial infarction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: