Mead's identification of ultimate reality with the experience of physical contact is rooted in his studies of animal perception. Many of his writings on the nature of science, aesthetic experience, and values can be viewed profitably as an attempt to generalize his theory of the act from an analysis of action toward mundane objects to include these other classes of perceptual objects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
J. David Lewis (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: