Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective/Research Question: This study explores the potential for virtual international exchange to serve as a high impact practice that improves academic outcomes, defined credential completion, and GPA among low-income students enrolled at two community colleges in the U.S. Southeast. Specifically, we ask: What is the relationship between participation in virtual international exchange and two key indicators of students’ academic success, last-recorded cumulative GPA and credential completion, among community college students who receive Pell funding compared to those who do not? We adopt a capability approach to frame our work, which focuses attention on what low-income students are able to achieve when provided with opportunity rather than a lack of social status or financial means. Methods: Drawing data from 26,748 students, we use propensity score weighting to account for observed differences in virtual exchange participants and non-participants prior to estimating a series of linear regression models predicting a student’s credential completion and last-recorded GPA. Results: Our findings suggest that virtual exchange participation has a positive relationship with both measures of students’ academic success, credential completion and GPA. Conclusions/Contributions: Our results highlight the success that students are capable of when provided with the opportunity to engage with a high impact practice on their home campuses and have implications for both community college international educators and administrators.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Whatley et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: