Thus the values of pn for 2100 ^ re $J 2500 are still significantly low but higher than the value of pn at re = 2000.Note that the general size and trend of p", as well as its sudden deviation at re = 2000, indicate a non random character in the digits of e.More detailed investigations are in progress and will be reported later.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Olga Taussky (1950) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: