PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 2023British Journal of Educational Psychology11 citationsOpen Access

Preschool teachers' pedagogical content knowledge predicts willingness to scaffold early science learning

View Full Paper
LSLukas SchmittAWAnke Maria WeberLVLaura Venitz

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The importance of diagnostic and scaffolding activities for early science learning has been shown consistently. However, preschool teachers scarcely engage in them. We developed an instrument to assess preschool teachers' willingness to engage in diagnostic and scaffolding activities in science learning situations and examined its relation with teachers' knowledge, beliefs and practice. AIMS: We validate an instrument to assess willingness to engage in scaffolding and diagnostic activities and study the interplay between willingness, learning beliefs, content knowledge (CK) and pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) in the context of science learning, particularly block play. SAMPLE(S): A total of N = 151 preschool teachers from 41 kindergartens in Germany participated in our study. METHODS: Preschool teachers completed a questionnaire, which took approximately 1 hour of time. We drew a subsample of N = 73 teachers and observed their practice during a 30 min block play episode. RESULTS: With our instrument, we were able to distinguish between preschool teachers' willingness to diagnose and to scaffold. Preschool teachers' co-constructivist beliefs and PCK predicted willingness to engage in diagnosing, PCK also predicted willingness to engage in scaffolding. Associations between learning beliefs and practice were inconsistent. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights aspects of the association between preschool teachers' PCK and their willingness to engage in diagnosing and scaffolding. However, we found inconsistencies between preschool teachers' beliefs and practice, which call for further clarification.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Schmitt et al. (2023) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1eb1fa544bdf605faf2c80https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12618
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Socially desirable responding and its elusive effects on the validity of personality assessments.2012 · 136 citations
  2. 2lavaan : An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling2012 · 26,395 citations
  3. 3Block Talk: Spatial Language During Block Play2011 · 228 citations
  4. 4The Playing Learning Child: Towards a pedagogy of early childhood2008 · 570 citations
  5. 5Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives1999 · 108,216 citations