Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Aging is associated with the accumulation of damage throughout a persons life. Individual health can be assessed by the Frailty Index (FI). The FI is calculated simply as the proportion f of accumulated age-related deficits relative to the total, leading to a theoretical maximum of f≤1. Observational studies have generally reported a much more stringent bound, with f≤fₘₐₓ<1. The value of fₘₐₓ in observational studies appears to be nonuniversal, but fₘₐₓ≈0.7 is often reported. A previously developed network model of individual aging was unable to recover fₘₐₓ<1 while retaining the other observed phenomenology of increasing f and mortality rates with age. We have developed a computationally accelerated network model that also allows us to tune the scale-free network exponent α. The network exponent α significantly affects the growth of mortality rates with age. However, we are only able to recover fₘₐₓ by also introducing a deficit sensitivity parameter 1-q, which is equivalent to a false-negative rate q. Our value of q=0.3 is comparable to finite sensitivities of age-related deficits with respect to mortality that are often reported in the literature. In light of nonzero q, we use mutual information I to provide a nonparametric measure of the predictive value of the FI with respect to individual mortality. We find that I is only modestly degraded by q<1, and this degradation is mitigated when increasing number of deficits are included in the FI. We also find that the information spectrum, i.e., the mutual information of individual deficits versus connectivity, has an approximately power-law dependence that depends on the network exponent α. Mutual information I is therefore a useful tool for characterizing the network topology of aging populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Farrell et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: