Satellite validation study reveals ten to fifteen percent precision for global stratospheric nitric acid profiles, indicating reliable performance for atmospheric monitoring.
We present the first evaluation of the HNO 3 data product (version 2.04.09) from the High Resolution Dynamics Limb Sounder (HIRDLS) on the Earth Observing System (EOS) Aura satellite. The HIRDLS instrument obtains between 5000 and 7000 HNO 3 profiles per day. HIRDLS HNO 3 data are generally good over the latitude range of 64°S to 80°N and pressure range 100 to 10 hPa, with some profiles, depending on latitude, having useful information between 100 to 161 hPa. The individual profile “measured” precision is between 10 and 15%, but can be much larger if the HNO 3 abundance is low or outside the 100 hPa to 10 hPa range. Global results are compared with the HNO 3 observations from version 2.2 of the EOS Aura Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS), and it is found that large‐scale features are consistent between the two instruments. HIRDLS HNO 3 is biased 0–20% low relative to Aura MLS in the mid‐to‐high latitudes and biased high in the tropical stratosphere. HIRDLS HNO 3 is also compared with Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment Fourier Transform Spectrometer (ACE‐FTS). In these mostly high‐latitude comparisons the HIRDLS HNO 3 data are biased 10–30% low, depending on altitude. Finally, the HIRDLS HNO 3 is compared to in situ data taken by the NOAA Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometer (CIMS) instrument flown during the 2005 NASA Houston Aura Validation Experiment (AVE) and the ability of HIRDLS to measure HNO 3 in the UTLS region is examined.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kinnison et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: