Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A sociologist from another specialism read a selection of literature from the last fifteen years of the sociology of science. Three lacunae were discovered, each an area apparently neglected by sociologists of every theoretical persuasion writing in the sociology of science. These three omissions are: treating science as a variety of work; studying the socialization of scientists and learning environments in science; and researching gender divisions in science. It is argued that neglect of these areas is causing the sociology of science to depart from its own agenda and programme.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sara Delamont (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: