Key result
Case report links long-term baricitinib therapy to NSTEMI in a high-risk rheumatoid arthritis patient.
Why the study?
The use of JAK inhibitors in older RA patients with baseline cardiovascular risk requires careful risk assessment, motivating discussion of real-world CV risk stratification, monitoring, and pharmacovigilance.
Case Report (n=1)
No
This detailed case report illustrates a potentially serious cardiovascular event (NSTEMI) occurring during long-term baricitinib therapy, emphasizing the importance of ongoing cardiovascular risk reassessment and pharmacovigilance in high-risk patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May flag NSTEMI risk with extended baricitinib in high-risk RA; hypothesis-generating and leaves open causality pending larger studies.
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with increased cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality, partly related to chronic systemic inflammation and accelerated atherosclerosis. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, including baricitinib, are effective targeted therapies for RA, but their use in older patients and those with baseline CV risk factors requires careful risk assessment. We report a clinically detailed case of non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) during long-term baricitinib therapy and use it to discuss real-world CV risk stratification, monitoring, and pharmacovigilance in patients with RA receiving JAK inhibitors. A 77-year-old Omani woman with seropositive erosive RA since age 69 (Month 0), poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus, well-controlled hypertension, well-controlled hyperlipidemia, obesity, and family history of myocardial infarction was treated with baricitinib 4 mg daily (Month 47) after inadequate response to previous disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Her RA remained in sustained remission for approximately 33 months on baricitinib and methotrexate. A cardiac evaluation performed five years earlier, including echocardiography and dobutamine stress testing, had not shown evidence of inducible ischemia or structural heart disease at that time. She subsequently developed sudden chest pain during physiotherapy, was diagnosed with NSTEMI (Month 79), and underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for severe calcified coronary artery disease with critical left anterior descending and diagonal branch stenoses. Baricitinib was discontinued at Month 80, and she remained in RA remission on methotrexate alone without recurrent CV events through her most recent follow-up (Month 108). A comprehensive literature review using MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Google Scholar identified only three relevant cases describing NSTEMI during baricitinib therapy in RA, but they lacked sufficient clinical detail for meaningful comparison. Naranjo adverse drug reaction probability scale supports a possible association. This case highlights the need for structured CV risk reassessment, shared decision-making, and pharmacovigilance during long-term JAK inhibitor therapy in high-risk patients with RA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alghaithi et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Rheumatoid arthritis (n=1). Baricitinib was evaluated on Development of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). A 77-year-old woman with rheumatoid arthritis and multiple cardiovascular risk factors developed a non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction after 33 months of clinical remission on baricitinib therapy.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: