Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Precocious puberty is a condition which has both important and diverse consequences for affected children and their families. The impact of precocious pubertal development on the patients is both physical and psychological. Because of the potential for a rapid, dynamic course of the disease it is necessary to make a correct diagnosis without delay in order to allow a judgement about the prospective course of the disease in terms of rate of pubertal progression, statural growth, bone age progression, development of reproductive functions and psychosocial adjustment and well-being. It is not surprising that there has been a controversial discussion about the indications for treatment, as precocious puberty is characterized by a great diversity in clinical presentation, in underlying causes for precocious development and thus, also, in its long-term prognosis. In this paper, we review some of the salient clinical, laboratory, and radiological features of the possible causes of precocious puberty and discuss the current treatment options as well as the long-term outcome. Puberty is the transitional period between childhood and adulthood during which human development progresses from the first appearance of secondary sexual characteristics to full sexual maturation with the capacity to reproduce. The onset of pubertal development and the progression to full maturity is controlled and regulated by several neuroendocrine factors and hormones (for review see Grumbach & Styne, 1998). The maturation of reproductive function depends on an increasing pulsatile secretion of GnRH into the hypophysial portal circulation, which in turn stimulates the pulsatile release of LH and FSH into the peripheral circulation (Boyar et al., 1974; Clarke & Cummins, 1982; Jakacki et al., 1982; Caraty & Locatelli, 1988; Wu et al., 1989, 1990; Oerter et al., 1990). LH stimulates Leydig cell secretion of testosterone in boys and ovarian gestagen secretion in girls after onset of ovulation. FSH has very little effect in boys until spermarche; in girls it stimulates follicle formation and oestrogen production. The physical changes of puberty are the result of the activation of the hypothalamic–pituitary-gonadal axis. In 95% of healthy girls puberty starts with the enlargement of the breasts (thelarche) between 8·5 and 13 years of age. This stage is generally followed by pubic and axillary hair development. The average time between first pubertal signs and menarche is 2·3 years. Most girls reach menarche at a mean (± SD) age of 13·5 ± 1·0 years (Marshall & Tanner, 1969). It has recently been suggested that the onset of puberty in U.S. girls seen in the paediatric office occurs earlier than previously thought (Herman-Giddens et al., 1997), however, several field studies have shown very little change in the mean age at menarche [Buckler, 1990 (13·35 ± 1·14 years), Engelhardt et al., 1995 (13·46 years = 50th centile), Fredriks et al. 2000 (13·15 years = 50th centile), Largo & Prader, 1983a (13·4 ± 1·1 years)]. Ethnic differences have also to be taken into account (Proos et al., 1991; Herman-Giddens et al., 1997). In 95% of boys pubertal development usually begins with testicular enlargement between the ages of 9·5–13·5 years (Largo & Prader, 1983b; Marshall & Tanner, 1970), followed by pubic hair development. The mean interval between initial genital development and mature external genitalia lasts 3 years (approximately 1 year per next genitalia stage). The pubertal growth spurt begins in girls in early puberty and in boys during mid-puberty (Marshall & Tanner, 1969, 1970; Largo & Prader, 1983a, 1983b). Precocious puberty is generally defined as the appearance of secondary sex characteristics before the age of 8 years in girls and 9 years in boys (Grumbach & Styne, 1998). In girls menarche before the ninth birthday may serve as an additional criterion. These diagnostic age limits have a statistical basis. However, they were chosen somewhat arbitrarily and may be subject to change over time (Kaplowitz & Oberfield, 1999). The arbitrary nature becomes obvious when one considers that the diagnostic age limit for thelarche corresponds to approximately –2·5 to –3·0 SD below the normal mean age [Largo & Prader, 1983a (10·9 ± 1·2 years); Marshall & Tanner, 1969 (11·2 ± 1·1 years)], and not the usual limit of –2·0 SD, while the cut-off age for menarche is in the range of –4 SD [Engelhardt et al., 1995 (11·32 years = 3rd centile); Fredriks et al., 2000 (11·77 = 10th centile)]. In addition, it is important to notice that two percent of healthy girls may show a pubertal stage B2 before their 8th birthday (Largo & Prader, 1983a). In boys the diagnostic age limit of 9 years for Tanner stage G2 corresponds to approximately –2·5 SD (Marshall & Tanner, 1970; Largo & Prader, 1983b; Willers et al., 1996). The aetiology of precocious puberty is variable and it is of utmost importance both for diagnostic strategy and treatment, and for distinguishing between central precocious puberty (CPP) which results from premature activation of the hypothalamic–pituitary-gonadal axis (GnRH-dependent) and GnRH-independent pseudoprecocious puberty (Fig. 1). Owing to the sequence of hormonal events, CPP is usually consonant although there may be marked variations in the effects of sex steroids on the development of secondary sex characteristics, height velocity and bone maturation. Furthermore, partial or incomplete forms of precocious puberty should be distinguished from complete forms, as should persistent from transient forms of CPP (Table 1). The recognition of transient forms is of particular importance in order to avoid unnecessary treatment in these patients (Palmert et al., 1999; Partsch et al., 1998) and so that outcome results of (unnecessary) treatment are not confused with the natural course of the disease (Partsch et al., 1999c). It is interesting to note that in some rare cases organic CPP may also be transient (Brauner et al., 1987a). Although it may be desirable for didactic reasons to think of CPP as one diagnostic category, it does not present as a homogeneous clinical picture. In contrast, CPP is much more a continuum of clinical presentation and rate of progression (Fig. 2), ranging from normal variants or incomplete forms of pubertal development to slowly progressive or transient forms and rapidly progressive forms (Pescovitz et al., 1986; Brauner et al., 1987b; Kreiter et al., 1993; Partsch et al., 1998; Palmert et al., 1999; Léger et al., 2000; Stanhope, 2000). Diagnostic scheme for the differentiation of gonadotropin-dependent from gonadotropin-independent precocious puberty (adapted from Partsch & Sippell, 2001). Gonadotropin-dependent or CPP is characterized by a pubertal LH response to a standard GnRH test (e.g. 60 µg/m2 i.v.). The hatched bar shows the reference range for stimulated LH in healthy prepubertal girls (Partsch et al., 1990). In addition, pulsatile spontaneous LH secretion is found at night (left panel). In contrast, in children with gonadotropin-independent or peripheral PPP no spontaneous LH pulses are present and the LH response to a GnRH challenge is absent or minimal (right panel). CAH = congenital adrenal hyperplasia. The spectrum of precocious pubertal development ranges from girls with the normal variant premature thelarche to those girls with the rapidly progressive forms of complete CPP. Persistent growth acceleration, early menarche, progressive bone age acceleration, and, thus, deterioration of final height potential is seen in the latter patients only. A progression from premature thelarche to overt progressive CPP is possible (Pasquino et al., 1995). In addition, a slowly progressive CPP may develop into a rapidly progressive form and vice versa (Pasquino et al., 1989; Schwarz et al., 1990; Kolmer et al., 1991; Partsch et al., 1998). Figure 3 gives an overview of the spectrum of the clinical, hormonal, and auxological findings seen in girls with progressive CPP. In rapidly progressive CPP, pubertal development is highly accelerated and proceeds much faster than in normal puberty (Schroor et al., 1995). Furthermore, the hormonal milieu is pathological: spontaneous LH pulses are of increased amplitude and plasma LH shows markedly increased levels after GnRH stimulation compared with the normal range for the respective pubertal stage (Partsch et al., 1989). Variance (ranges) of auxological and hormonal parameters in a cohort of 40 girls with progressive CPP at start of treatment, demonstrating the marked variability (Partsch et al., 1999c). Central precocious puberty is a rare disorder with an estimated incidence of 1 : 5000–1 : 10 000 (Gonzalez, 1982; Cutler, 1988). The sex distribution (girls to boys) is reported to be between 3 and 1 (Kappy & Ganong, 1994) and 23 and 1 (Bridges et al., 1994). There is a predisposition for the development of CPP in children with neurofibromatosis type 1 (2·4–5%: Habiby et al., 1995, 1997; Cnossen et al., 1997; Carmi et al., 1999; Virdis et al., 2000), in children with hydrocephalus (10–11%: Abdolvahabi et al., 2000; Brauner et al., 1987a; De Luca et al., 1985; Kaiser et al., 1989; Lopponen et al., 1996; Siddiqi et al., 1999; Tomono et al., 1983), in children with meningomyelocele (5–33%: Hunt, 1990; Meyer & Landau, 1984; Trollmann et al., 1996, 1998), in children with neonatal encephalopathy (4·3%: Robertson et al., 1990), and in children after low dose cranial irradiation (Brauner et al., 1984, 1999; Ogilvy-Stuart et al., 1994). An association of Williams–Beuren syndrome with an increased frequency of CPP was recently reported (Scothorn & Butler, 1997; Cherniske et al., 1999; Partsch et al., 1999b). Furthermore, children adopted from developing countries are prone to develop CPP (Bourguignon et al., 1992; Proos et al., 1991; Tuvemo & Proos, 1993; Virdis et al., 1998; Bureau et al., 1999; Tuvemo et al., 1999; De Monleon et al., 2000; Krsterska-Konstantinova et al., 2001; Mul et al., 2001). It has been postulated that CPP may be found in up to 25% of girls seen at one institution for precocious puberty (Bourguignon et al., 1992) and in up to 45% of adopted girls and in a much smaller percentage in boys (8·6%; Baron et al., 2000). While an underlying CNS pathology is found in a subset of CPP patients, this is not the case in many others even with the use of modern imaging techniques. The distribution of idiopathic vs. organic CPP varies widely: 69% to 98% idiopathic cases in girls and 0% to 60% in boys, respectively (Thamdrup, 1961; Pescovitz et al., 1986; Brauner & Rappaport, 1993; Bridges et al., 1994; Kappy & Ganong, 1994; Carel et al., 1999; Heger et al., 1999; Partsch et al., 1999b; Cisternino et al., 2000; De Sanctis et al., 2000; Mul et al., 2000). Thus, the risk for organic CPP is much higher in boys than in girls. In addition, the risk of a CNS lesion as the cause for CPP is higher in younger than in older patients (Cassio et al., 2000; Cisternino et al., 2000). An overview of the various aetiologies of CPP is given in Table 1. Hypothalamic hamartomas are congenital, non-neoplastic tumour-like lesions formed by heterotopic grey matter, neurones, glial cells and fibre bundles (Inoue et al., 1995). They are usually located at the base of the brain at the floor of the third ventricle, near the tuber cinereum or near the mamillary bodies. Owing to the nature of hypothalamic hamartomas as congenital malformations, they frequently cause precocious puberty at a relatively early age, in some cases even starting at birth (Albright & Lee, 1992; Guibaud et al., 1995; De Brito et al., 1999). Some hypothalamic hamartomas are associated with gelastic seizures which are often resistant to anticonvulsive treatment (Cascino et al., 1993; Marliani et al., 1991; Nishio et al., 1994; Fukuda et al., 1999; Regis et al., 2000; Rosenfeld et al., 2001). Highly suggestive signs for the diagnosis of a hypothalamic hamartoma are: (i) precocious onset of pubertal development at a very young age [usually < 4 years; often < 2 years of age (Cassio et al., 2000; Comite et al., 1984; Colaco et al., 1993; Mahachoklertwattana et al., 1993; Kornreich et al., 1995; de Brito et al., 1999; Jung et al., 1999)]; (ii) hormonal findings compatible with central activation of the GnRH pulse generator (i.e. pulsatile gonadotropin secretion and increased LH response in the GnRH stimulation test); (iii) the demonstration of an isointense tumour in typical location showing no gadolinium enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (Fig. 4); (iv) the absence of any sign of precocious pseudopuberty (i.e. absence of biochemical tumour markers, such as β-HCG and AFP). The younger the child, the higher the chance that the presence of a hypothalamic hamartoma is the cause of CPP (Cisternino et al., 2000). Hypothalamic hamartomas are responsible for CPP in 2–28% of patients [2·3% (Cacciari et al., 1990; Cisternino et al., 2000); 13·3% (De Sanctis et al., 2000); 14% (Hibi & Fujiwara, 1987); 12·9% (Kornreich et al., 1995); 28% (Lyon et al., 1985); 21% (Partsch et al., 1999c); 10% (Robben et al., 1995); 11·5% (Sharafuddin et al., 1994)]. Midsagittal T1-weighted MR image after gadolinium injection in an 11 month old boy with organic central precocious puberty (GnRH test: LH 1·2 → 12.7 IU/l, FSH 0·4 → 0·6 IU/l, testosterone 2.4 nmol/l, bone age acceleration to 2.5 years) showing hypothalamic hamartoma (arrow) without contrast enhancement. MR imaging is of particular importance in the diagnosis of hypothalamic hamartomas as these may be overlooked on cranial computerized tomography (CT) scans (Kornreich et al., 1995; Robben et al., 1995; Feilberg Jorgensen et al., 1998; De Sanctis et al., 2000) and histological examination will not be carried out in most patients. The typical MRI picture is that of an isointense structure on T1-weighted images which may be isointense or slightly hyperintense on T2-weighted images (Fig. 4). The question of the adequate and optimal treatment of children with hypothalamic hamartoma and CPP has been discussed controversially in the literature (Siegel-Witchel, 1995; Starceski et al., 1990). Over the past five decades neurosurgical treatment has been associated with considerable risk and high neurological morbidity (Zuniga et al., 1983; Breningstall, 1985; Sato et al., 1985; Berkovic et al., 1997). In general, the paediatric, and recently, also, neurosurgical recommendation is that long-acting GnRH agonists are the first choice of treatment in patients with precocious puberty due to hypothalamic hamartomas (Feuillan et al., 1999; Stewart et al., 1998; Partsch et al., 1999a). Successful suppression treatment has been reported by several groups for a duration of up to 8·4 years (Chamouilli et al., 1995; Comite et al., 1984; Mahachoklertwattana et al., 1993; Stewart et al., 1998; de Brito et al., 1999; Feuillan et al., 1999; Ishii et al., 1999). Long-term studies and outcome data after treatment with GnRH agonists are favourable and do not show negative sequelae (de Brito et al., 1999; Feuillan et al., 1999, 2000; Heger et al., 1999). In particular, depot preparations ensure an adult height within the genetic height potential with normal body proportions, bone density and reproductive function (Feuillan et al., 2000; Heger et al., 1999). Long-term exposure to sex steroids leads to an increased growth rate, to an accelerated bone age development, and to the maturation of hypothalamic centres that are important for the initiation of puberty. Efficient treatment of the primary disease causes a decrease in sex steroid levels and thereby activates the hypothalamic GnRH pulse generator via a feedback system that has matured prematurely during the period of exposure to sex steroids. Thus, secondary central precocious puberty develops. The most important examples in this category of precocious puberty are congenital adrenal hyperplasia (Wilkins & Cara, 1954; Penny et al., 1973; Pescovitz et al., 1984; Pouw et al., 1986; Dacou-Voutetakis & Karidis, 1993; Soliman et al., 1997; Frenzel & Doerr, 1998) and familial or sporadic male-limited precocious puberty (Bertelloni et al., 1997; Holland et al., 1987; Holland, 1991; Boepple et al., 1992; Laue et al., 1993; Gromoll et al., 1998; Leschek et al., 1999). Secondary central precocious puberty has also been described in a few patients with McCune Albright syndrome (Eugster et al., 1999; Foster et al., 1985; Kaufman et al., 1986; Lee et al., 1986; Feuillan et al., 1993; Schmidt & Kiess, 1998). After initiation of effective treatment of the primary, gonadotropin-independent puberty, in the majority of cases the course of these diseases is complicated by secondary central precocious puberty (Laue et al., 1989, 1993; Leschek et al., 1999). The occurrence of CPP depends on the maturational status of the children (Holland et al., 1987). In most patients secondary CPP occurs at bone ages between 10 and 13 years (Holland et al., 1987; Laue et al., 1989, 1993; Holland, 1991; Feuillan et al., 1993; Bertelloni et al., 1997; Gromoll et al., 1998; Leschek et al., 1999; Latronico et al., 2000b). However, some patients may experience CPP at higher bone ages (Boepple et al., 1992; Leschek et al., 1999) or, in some cases, not at all, despite older or even adult bone ages (Feuillan et al., 1993; Latronico et al., 2000a). The time course of development of secondary CPP is quite variable, but CPP may develop as early as one month after initiation of treatment of peripheral precocious puberty (PPP) (Holland et al., 1987). It is noteworthy that secondary CPP may also occur spontaneously without any treatment (Egli et al., 1985). In most cases secondary CPP is permanent, however, one case of 'transient' central precocious puberty secondary to nonclassic 21-hydroxylase deficiency has been reported (Speiser, 1995). The patient's history should include the age at onset of pubertal development, the rate of progression of pubertal signs, the growth pattern during the last 6–12 months, the presence of secondary sexual characteristics and additional signs of puberty (acne, oily skin, erections, nocturnal emissions in boys and vaginal discharge and menstrual bleedings in girls). A positive family history of precocious puberty may suggest familial cases of CPP or familial male precocious puberty. The physical examination includes the pubertal stages according to Tanner (Marshall & Tanner, 1969; 1970) and the measurement of height, weight and body proportions. A growth curve including height data should be (Fig. velocity is on the of the height most patients with CPP have a height velocity the age of the an of the and is the bone age is accelerated by more than 2 standard for age it is that the has a normal variant of pubertal development. the of should be over a This is 1·2 in the majority of patients with progressive CPP et al., 1998; Partsch et al., 1999c). curve of a with idiopathic central precocious puberty (GnRH test: LH → IU/l, of early onset at age years. The was first with and between 2 and 4 years of age and was to depot by injection for age height for bone age & and adult height & are shown until final = The shows height for bone age during development. the deterioration from age years and the to a normal final height age progression was at 11 years between and years of age. The initial hormonal includes plasma sex steroids and a standard GnRH test (e.g. GnRH 60 µg/m2 LH and FSH measurement at and are and may be In it is to one plasma at after GnRH There is no additional diagnostic of the GnRH test with et al., 1995). The GnRH test is important for the differentiation between central and gonadotropin-independent precocious puberty (Fig. Brito et al., 1999). CPP is characterized by a pubertal response of LH to GnRH levels for a pubertal LH on the LH 1994; et al., 2000) with a LH response compared to the FSH response (Partsch et al., 1989; Pescovitz et al., 1988). It is that the LH is not higher than the prepubertal range but is also in of the normal range for the respective pubertal stage in of girls with CPP (Fig. Partsch et al., 1989). and GnRH stimulated LH levels ± are shown in girls with CPP at diagnosis and for year of treatment with depot until treatment the mean LH response to GnRH was not compared to the prepubertal reference range but also compared to the reference range for pubertal girls with stage five Partsch et al., 1990). treatment, the mean LH response to GnRH was to after of treatment stimulated plasma LH normal pubertal LH levels were seen in a few girls only. or gonadotropin levels are of no great diagnostic for CPP the 3rd highly it is possible to gonadotropin levels et al., LH levels with an and may be a test for patients with CPP et al., However, the GnRH test the most important test in the diagnostic of children of CPP 1994). in the including the GnRH test with a after 40 for stimulated LH et al., 1996; & 1999) and the stimulation test et al., 1993; et al., may also be but have not been in of children and, in the case of the include In general, test results should a of the after of the typical findings will not be present in CPP Thus, the diagnosis not depends on the hormonal data but also on the clinical picture. plasma testosterone levels are in CPP The diagnostic of is as approximately of the CPP girls show low prepubertal levels (Partsch et al., 1999c). including function and may be necessary to causes of precocious puberty. is a in the of girls with CPP et al., 1986; et al., 1988; et al., 1990; et al., 1993; Bridges et al., 1995; et al., et al., 1995; et al., 1998; et al., 1998). The of and be compared to reference data (Bridges et al., 1996; et al., 1985; et al., & 1994). diagnostic parameters for CPP are the of enlargement is a of CPP et al., 1994; et al., 1993; et al., and et al., 1995; et al., 1988). are et al., in in Bridges et al., et al., Bridges et al., 1996; et al., 2000), as well as ovarian structure or in and or in CPP et al., 1998; et al., 1986; et al., 1988; et al., 2000), and or of the et al., However, most from their studies that of these parameters CPP from normal girls or from those with premature thelarche and, thus, should not be as the diagnostic for CPP patients 1999). a and for CPP of has been reported et al., 1995). and is in patients with precocious puberty to adrenal or ovarian or ovarian resonance imaging of the CNS is necessary in with CPP in order to a central system lesion as the cause of CPP (Table 1). studies have shown in of patients that CPP may be the of an tumour or (Cacciari et al., 1983; Robben et al., 1995; Cisternino et al., 2000; et al., 2001). lesions be in of girls and in of boys with CPP. imaging to of CPP patients, boys (Bridges et al., 1994) or young girls is not adequate as lesions be the cause of CPP in both and in age groups to years in boys et al., and up to 8 years in girls (Cisternino et al., The most CNS lesion associated with CPP is hypothalamic from CPP hamartomas are usually and may be by MRI (Robben et al., 1995; Feilberg Jorgensen et al., 1998). resonance imaging in patients with CPP the chance to some CNS early et al., 2001; Cisternino et al., There is no in the literature about the for treatment in CPP children & 1990; 1994; 1999; Léger et al., 2000). However, there is that not patients with CPP The for treatment may be or auxological or a of few and long-term sequelae have been described in CPP patients & 1994; et al., 1984; et al., 1984; et al., 1985; & 1990; & 1992) and sexual and early to be rare (Herman-Giddens et al., 1988; 1961; & However, it is that girls and boys with CPP have earlier sexual than healthy girls et al., 1984; 1961; & & in patients with as in Williams–Beuren this early sexual may for the and may be of potential to the that the psychosocial for CPP treatment has to be a very 1994). to the auxological there is much about adequate 1999). However, some complete and progressive CPP and height potential 1994) or deterioration of final height et al., 2000). these it becomes obvious that many children to have examination before a about the for treatment be 1999; et al., 2000). In contrast to others & 1990; 1994) experience is that sex steroid levels are in the for or treatment to the pubertal range 1999). cut-off for the in the literature are not indications for treatment are in Table GnRH treatment is not in patients of pubertal gonadotropin with slowly CPP, and with height potential & 1990; 1994; 1999; Léger et al., 2000). are of psychosocial of early menarche and early sexual of body and of normal height potential in to the of of GnRH in depot for the use in treatment of CPP with or has of effects hormonal suppression and auxological outcome et al., and their potential for & The first of suppression in CPP patients by GnRH agonists to et al., et al., et al.,
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Partsch et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: