Because of the potential impact on user's life in cooperative automated safety applications, the security of Vehicle-to-X communication (V2X) is mandatory. However, the current attacker model used in literature is often too network-oriented, and it is unclear what realistic attacks could be. In this paper, we use the V2X data lifecycle to derive the attack surfaces. From this, we lay the foundations of a revisited attacker model, which details realistic attacks and identify appropriate countermeasures. We demonstrate that while the security of data processing, data at rest, and data in-transit is well-advanced, the security of meta-data and data acquisition requires extra attention by the research community.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Petit et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: