Introduction The analysis of industrial districts (IDs) has attract-ed a growing interest in the past decades in differ-ent disciplines. From the seminal contribution ofAlfred Marshall it appeared clear that the fact of be-ing historically localized in a specific industrial siteis advantageous for firms which can benefit fromthe availability of skilled labour forces, knowl-edgeable agents and new ideas that are free ‘in theair’. On one hand, knowledge was conceptualizedas the result of the working of the ID device: a pub-lic good, whose diffusion is due to spill-overs andtechnological externalities. On the other hand, it isthe same mechanism of interaction among co-lo-calized firms that has attracted the attention ofeconomists and sociologists, because the ID modelappears to be a particularly efficient localized sys-tem to stimulate the creation of new knowledge bysome firms, and enforce learning mechanismsamong some proprietary but sometimes open local-ized networks. This article discusses both perspec-tives in depth. It consists of two parts. The first ex-plores the nature of knowledge, and in order to in-terpret the phenomenon of local agglomeration andthe formation of the industrial districts (IDs)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Belussi et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: