Key result
Prior myocardial infarction in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction is associated with significantly reduced global longitudinal strain (-17.3% vs -19.3%, p=0.012).
Why the study?
Does global longitudinal strain (GLS) measured by CMR feature tracking accurately identify prior myocardial infarction in patients with preserved LVEF?
Case-Control (n=80)
No
Does global longitudinal strain (GLS) measured by CMR feature tracking accurately identify prior myocardial infarction in patients with preserved LVEF?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.662 (95% CI 0.54-0.785)
Absolute Event Rate: -17.3% vs -19.3%
p-value: p=0.012
Global longitudinal strain parameters measured by CMR feature tracking can identify prior myocardial infarction in patients with preserved LVEF, outperforming traditional assessments of wall motion abnormality.
Supports GLS by CMR feature tracking to detect prior MI despite preserved LVEF; leaves open prospective validation and outcome impact.
Prior myocardial infarction (MI) is associated with increased mortality and is prevalent in certain high risk patient groups. Electrocardiogram may be used in diagnosis, however, sensitivity is limited, thus non-invasive imaging techniques may improve diagnosis. We investigated whether global longitudinal strain (GLS) and longitudinal strain parameters are reduced in patients with prior MI but preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The study included 40 clinical patients with prior MI occurring >3 months previously (defined as subendocardial hyperenhancement on late Gadolinium enhancement imaging) with LVEF ≥ 55% and 40 controls matched for age and LVEF. GLS, global longitudinal strain rate (GLSR) and early diastolic longitudinal strain rate (GLSRe) were measured from cine imaging feature tracking analysis. Presence of wall motion abnormality (WMA) and minimum systolic wall thickening (SWT) were calculated from cine imaging. GLS was -17.3 ± 3.7% in prior MI versus -19.3 ± 1.9% in controls (p = 0.012). GLSR was -88.0 ± 33.7%/s in prior MI versus -103.3 ± 26.5%/s in controls (p = 0.005). GLSRe was 76.4 ± 28.4%/s in prior MI versus 95.5 ± 26.0%/s in controls (p = 0.001). GLS accurately identified prior MI [AUC 0.662 (95% CI 0.54-0.785) p = 0.012] whereas WMA [AUC 0.500 (95% CI 0.386-0.614) p = 1.0] and minimum SWT [AUC 0.609 (95% CI 0.483-0.735) p = 0.093] did not. GLS, GLSR and GLSRe are reduced in prior MI with preserved LVEF. Normal LVEF and lack of WMA cannot exclude prior MI. Prior MI should be considered when reduced GLS, GLSR or GLSRe are detected by non-invasive imaging.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fent et al. (2017) conducted a case-control in Prior myocardial infarction with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (n=80). Prior myocardial infarction vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on Global longitudinal strain (GLS) (AUC 0.662, 95% CI 0.54-0.785, p=0.012). Prior myocardial infarction in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction is associated with significantly reduced global longitudinal strain (-17.3% vs -19.3%, p=0.012).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: