Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes 1. In respect of the field of gender relations, see Bourdieu's (2001 Bourdieu, P. 2001. Masculine domination, Cambridge, , UK: Polity Press. [Google Scholar]) Masculine domination and the edited collection by Adkins and Skeggs (2004 Adkins, L. and Skeggs, B., eds. 2004. Feminism after Bourdieu, Oxford: Blackwell. [Google Scholar]) Feminism after Bourdieu. 2. For an extended account of capitals by Bourdieu see Bourdieu (2004). 3. For an intelligent account of the location of Bourdieu's ouevre within French (and international) intellectual traditions, see Jeremy Lane's (2000 Lane, J. F. 2000. Pierre Bourdieu: a critical introduction, London: Pluto Press. [Google Scholar]) Pierre Bourdieu: a critical account.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lingard et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: