Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
When suitably generalized and interpreted, the path-integral offers an alternative to the more familiar quantal formalism based on state-vectors, selfadjoint operators, and external observers. Mathematically one generalizes the path-integral-as-propagator to a quantal measure µ on the space Ω of all “conceivable worlds”, and this generalized measure expresses the dynamics or law of motion of the theory, much as Wiener measure expresses the dynamics of Brownian motion. Within such “histories-based ” schemes new, and more “realistic ” possibilities open up for resolving the philosophical problems of the state-vector formalism. In particular, one can dispense with the need for external agents by locating the predictive content of µ in its sets of measure zero: such sets are to be “precluded”. But unrestricted application of this rule engenders contradictions. One possible response would remove the contradictions by circumscribing the application of the preclusion concept. Another response, more in the tradition of “quantum
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rafael D. Sorkin (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: