This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Graphitic biocarbon comprising of graphene-like shells, nanotube-like structures, spherical clusters of graphitic biocarbon encapsulated Fe, and amorphous biocarbon, were simultaneously synthesized from spent coffee grounds. The study investigated the influence of two distinct types of non-toxic, easily accessible metal catalysts on graphitization, and the evolution of the catalyst-impregnated biocarbon nanostructures with temperature. The findings show that using Ca as a catalyst produces a highly porous graphitic structure with a larger crystallite size (L c = 14.38 nm) and nanotube-like structures that become denser with temperature, increasing in diameter from 58.48 nm at 1200 °C to 93.64 nm at 1800 °C. Conversely, Fe as catalyst produces non-porous graphitic structures with a smaller crystallite size (L c = 4.06 nm). Notably, unlike previous literature reports, nanotube-like structures were observed only in Ca-catalyzed biocarbon, not in the Fe-catalyzed ones. • The choice of metal catalyst influences the resulting graphitic structures obtained • Notable distinction in the crystallite sizes obtained for Ca and Fe catalyzed biocarbon • Highly porous graphitic structure obtained with Ca as catalyst, whereas using Fe results in non-porous graphitic structures • Nanotube-like graphitic structures synthesized from coffee grounds using Ca as catalyst
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ngene et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: