Key result
Lipid-testing intervals >6 months were associated with an increased risk of total stroke compared to intervals ≤6 months among newly diagnosed dyslipidemia patients on statins (p for trend <0.001).
Why the study?
Although current guidelines recommend regular lipid testing for dyslipidemia patients, the effectiveness of regular lipid profile monitoring on clinical outcomes remains unclear.
Does a lipid-testing interval of >6 months increase stroke risk compared to ≤6 months in newly diagnosed dyslipidemia patients initiated on statins?
Cohort (n=64,664)
Does a lipid-testing interval of >6 months increase stroke risk compared to ≤6 months in newly diagnosed dyslipidemia patients initiated on statins?
Lipid testing intervals longer than 6 months are associated with an increased risk of stroke in newly diagnosed dyslipidemia patients initiated on statins.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Longer intervals associated with higher stroke risk; leaves open whether ≤6-month testing improves outcomes in dyslipidemia.
(1) Background: Although current guidelines recommend regular lipid testing for dyslipidemia patients, the effectiveness of regular lipid profile monitoring in clinical outcomes is unclear. (2) Methods: We assessed 64,664 newly diagnosed dyslipidemia patients from the Korean National Health Insurance Service Health Screening Cohort from 2003–2011 For lipid-testing frequency from all admission and outpatient records for 3 years after diagnosis. Participants were followed until 31 December 2015 for stroke. We used Cox regression analysis to determine the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for stroke according to lipid-testing interval. (3) Results: Compared to patients with lipid-testing intervals of ≤6 months, patients with >6 to ≤12 (aHR 1.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08–1.61), >12 to ≤18 (aHR 1.48, 95% CI 1.20–1.82), and >18 (aHR 1.54, 95% CI 1.25–1.90) month testing intervals had elevated risk of total stroke (p for trend <0.001). A significant association existed between lipid-testing interval and total and ischemic stroke risk in the >6 to ≤12 (aHR 1.62, 95% CI 1.19–2.21), >12 to ≤18 (aHR 1.87, 95% CI 1.36–2.58), and >18 (aHR 1.79, 95% CI 1.30–2.48) month interval groups, but no significant association existed between lipid-testing interval and hemorrhagic stroke risk. (4) Conclusions: Lipid-testing intervals of more than 6 months may lead to increased stroke risk among newly diagnosed dyslipidemia patients after initiation of statin treatment. Lipid testing every 6 months can lower stroke risk among dyslipidemia patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ko et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Dyslipidemia (n=64,664). Lipid-testing interval >6 months vs. Lipid-testing interval ≤6 months was evaluated on Total stroke (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.08-1.61, p=<0.001). Lipid-testing intervals >6 months were associated with an increased risk of total stroke compared to intervals ≤6 months among newly diagnosed dyslipidemia patients on statins (p for trend <0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: