Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The model of marital fertility first proposed by Coale (1971) has proved to be a powerful analytical tool. It has been shown to be a useful component of a full model of age-specific fertility rates (Coale and Trussell 1974) and has been employed in several procedures for estimating fertility (Coale et al. 1975) and mortality (Trussell 1975; Hill and Trussell 1977) from inaccurate and incomplete data. This model has also proved to be a useful descriptive tool in examining whether fertility is natural (Barclay et al. 1976; Trussell 1977) in the sense of Henry (1961) in interpolating five-year rates to obtain single-year rates and in tracing the time sequence of control of fertility (Trussell 1974; Knodel 1977). This latter use has induced us to propose a standard technique for estimating the parameters of the model so that results quoted by different investigators would be comparable. (excerpt)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Coale et al. (1978) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: