Key result
A noncontact smartphone camera-based multi-channel RGB method for SpO2 monitoring achieved a mean absolute error of 1.26%, outperforming the traditional ratio-of-ratios method by 25%.
Why the study?
Contact-based smartphone SpO2 monitoring requires placing a finger on the camera, raising skin irritation and sanitary concerns, especially during pandemics.
Does a noncontact multi-channel ratio-of-ratios method using smartphone cameras improve the accuracy of SpO2 monitoring compared to the traditional two-wavelength method?
Does a noncontact multi-channel ratio-of-ratios method using smartphone cameras improve the accuracy of SpO2 monitoring compared to the traditional two-wavelength method?
A novel noncontact smartphone-based SpO2 monitoring method using a multi-channel ratio-of-ratios approach achieved a mean absolute error of 1.26%, outperforming traditional methods by 25%.
Blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) is an important indicator for pulmonary and respiratory functionalities. Clinical findings on COVID-19 show that many patients had dangerously low blood oxygen levels not long before conditions worsened. It is therefore recommended, especially for the vulnerable population, to regularly monitor the blood oxygen level for precaution. Recent works have investigated how ubiquitous smartphone cameras can be used to infer SpO2. Most of these works are contact-based, requiring users to cover a phone's camera and its nearby light source with a finger to capture reemitted light from the illuminated tissue. Contact-based methods may lead to skin irritation and sanitary concerns, especially during a pandemic. In this paper, we propose a noncontact method for SpO2 monitoring using hand videos acquired by smartphones. Considering the optical broadband nature of the red (R), green (G), and blue (B) color channels of the smartphone cameras, we exploit all three channels of RGB sensing to distill the SpO2 information beyond the traditional ratio-of-ratios (RoR) method that uses only two wavelengths. To further facilitate an accurate SpO2 prediction, we design adaptive narrow bandpass filters based on accurately estimated heart rate to obtain the most cardiac-related AC component for each color channel. Experimental results show that our proposed blood oxygen estimation method can reach a mean absolute error of 1.26% when a pulse oximeter is used as a reference, outperforming the traditional RoR method by 25%.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tian et al. (2021) studied Blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) monitoring. Noncontact hand video-based SpO2 monitoring using smartphone cameras (multi-channel RGB RoR method) vs. Traditional two-wavelength ratio-of-ratios (RoR) method was evaluated on Mean absolute error of SpO2 estimation compared to a pulse oximeter reference (25% improvement). A noncontact smartphone camera-based multi-channel RGB method for SpO2 monitoring achieved a mean absolute error of 1.26%, outperforming the traditional ratio-of-ratios method by 25%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: