Why the study?
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing is standard for assessing functional capacity after myocardial infarction, but combining it with dynamic stress echocardiography may provide a more comprehensive evaluation.
Does combined cardiopulmonary exercise testing and stress echocardiography identify impaired functional and myocardial performance in male post-MI patients compared to healthy controls?
Case-Control (n=36)
Blinded offline analysis
No
Does combined cardiopulmonary exercise testing and stress echocardiography identify impaired functional and myocardial performance in male post-MI patients compared to healthy controls?
Combined CPET and stress echocardiography safely and effectively identifies subclinical myocardial dysfunction and reduced functional reserve in post-MI patients, highlighting ΔGLS as a valuable prognostic marker.
May support combined CPET-stress echo for detecting post-MI impairment; leaves open whether ΔGLS improves risk stratification.
Background: A thorough post-myocardial infarction (MI) evaluation is essential for prognosis and rehabilitation. While cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is the standard for assessing functional capacity, combining it with dynamic stress echocardiography (DSE) may offer a more comprehensive assessment. Aim: This study examined the role of stress echocardiography (SE) in male post-MI patients by evaluating left ventricular function with conventional indices and the change in global longitudinal strain (ΔGLS) at rest and during maximal treadmill CPET. A secondary aim was to determine whether ΔGLS could provide additional value to traditional measures in post-MI care. Methods: Eighteen men with a recent MI [15 ST-elevation MI, three non-ST-elevation MI; mean age 53.2 ± 5.9 years, mean body mass index (BMI) 27.9 ± 2.2, 44.4% with a smoking history) and 18 age-matched male controls (mean age 50.1 ± 10.8 years, mean BMI 26.5 ± 2.4, 39.0% with smoking history) were enrolled. All MI patients were under optimal medical therapy, including β-blockers, which were withheld on the test day. Most underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) n = 2, or PCI for non-ST-elevation MI (NSTEMI) n = 3. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) were measured at rest and at peak effort and correlated with CPET parameters. Results: Post-MI patients had lower LVEF (50.6% vs. 60.7% at rest; 55.3% vs. 67.4% at peak, both p < 0.001), impaired GLS (–14.7% vs. –20.2% at rest, p = 0.003; –15.8% vs. –22.7% at peak, p = 0.001), and reduced VO2peak (29.2 vs. 41.9 mL/kg/min, p < 0.001) compared with controls. In the MI group, ΔGLS correlated with VO2peak (r = –0.645, p = 0.003) and VE/VCO2 (r = 0.539, p = 0.020), indicating its potential as a marker of functional reserve. Conclusions: Combined CPET and SE offered comprehensive insights into functional and myocardial performance, identifying ΔGLS as a useful non-invasive index for risk stratification and rehabilitation after MI, with high feasibility and safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Afthonidis et al. (2025) conducted a case-control in Recent Myocardial Infarction (n=36). Recent Myocardial Infarction vs. Age-matched healthy controls was evaluated on Peak global longitudinal strain (GLS) during maximal treadmill CPET (p=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: