The combination of heart rate variability and three speech measures explained 90% of the participants' experienced valence-arousal, significantly outperforming basic emotion categorization.
Observational (n=40)
The combination of heart rate variability and speech measures can accurately assess people's experienced valence and arousal, advancing emotion-aware computing.
Estimación del efecto: 90% explained variance
valor p: p=<0.001
Emotions are a crucial element for personal and ubiquitous computing. What to sense and how to sense it, however, remain a challenge. This study explores the rare combination of speech, electrocardiogram, and a revised Self-Assessment Mannequin to assess people’s emotions. 40 people watched 30 International Affective Picture System pictures in either an office or a living-room environment. Additionally, their personality traits neuroticism and extroversion and demographic information (i.e., gender, nationality, and level of education) were recorded. The resulting data were analyzed using both basic emotion categories and the valence--arousal model, which enabled a comparison between both representations. The combination of heart rate variability and three speech measures (i.e., variability of the fundamental frequency of pitch (F0), intensity, and energy) explained 90% (p < .001) of the participants’ experienced valence--arousal, with 88% for valence and 99% for arousal (ps < .001). The six basic emotions could also be discriminated (p < .001), although the explained variance was much lower: 18–20%. Environment (or context), the personality trait neuroticism, and gender proved to be useful when a nuanced assessment of people’s emotions was needed. Taken together, this study provides a significant leap toward robust, generic, and ubiquitous emotion-aware computing.
Egon L. van den Broek (Fri,) conducted a observational in Healthy volunteers (emotion recognition) (n=40). Combination of speech features and heart rate variability was evaluated on Explained variance of experienced valence-arousal (90% explained variance, p=<0.001). The combination of heart rate variability and three speech measures explained 90% of the participants' experienced valence-arousal, significantly outperforming basic emotion categorization.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: