Key result
Admission of local family medicine patients to general medicine inpatient services was associated with a 33% longer adjusted length of stay (95% CI 24%-44%) compared to a family medicine service.
Why the study?
Academic hospitalists may be less aware of local resources to support transitions home, prompting investigation into whether family medicine patients have shorter stays on a family medicine service.
Does admission to a family medicine inpatient service reduce length of stay in local family medicine patients compared to general medicine inpatient services?
Cohort (n=3,100)
No
Does admission to a family medicine inpatient service reduce length of stay in local family medicine patients compared to general medicine inpatient services?
Effect estimate: 33% longer (95% CI 24%-44%)
Local primary care patients have significantly shorter hospital lengths of stay when cared for by a family medicine inpatient service compared to general medicine hospitalists, without an increase in 30-day readmissions.
May favor family medicine inpatient care for shorter stays in local patients; leaves open confirmation via randomized trials.
INTRODUCTION: Hospitalists have been shown to have shorter lengths of stays than physicians with concurrent outpatient practices. However, hospitalists at academic medical centers may be less aware of local resources that can support the hospital to home transition for local primary care patients. We hypothesized that local family medicine patients admitted to a family medicine inpatient service have shorter length of stay than those admitted to general hospitalist services which also care for tertiary patients at an academic medical center. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at an academic medical center with a department of family medicine providing primary care to over 80 000 local patients. A total of 3100 consecutive family medicine patients admitted to either the family medicine inpatient service or a general medicine inpatient service over 3 years were studied. The primary outcome was length of stay, which was adjusted using multivariate linear regression for demographics, prior utilization, diagnosis, and disease severity. RESULTS: Adjusted length of stay was 33% longer (95% CI 24%-44%) for local family medicine patients admitted to general medicine inpatient services as compared with the family medicine inpatient service. Readmission rates within 30 days were not different (19% vs 16%, P = .14). CONCLUSIONS: Local primary care patients were safely discharged from the hospital sooner on the family medicine inpatient service than on general medicine inpatient services. This is likely because the family physicians staffing their inpatient service are more familiar with outpatient resources that can be effectively marshaled to help local patients with the transition from hospital to home.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Garrison et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Inpatient admission (n=3,100). Admission to general medicine inpatient services vs. Family medicine inpatient service was evaluated on length of stay (33% longer, 95% CI 24%-44%). Admission of local family medicine patients to general medicine inpatient services was associated with a 33% longer adjusted length of stay (95% CI 24%-44%) compared to a family medicine service.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: