Key result
Contrast-enhanced CMR detects large apical LV thrombus missed by serial non-contrast TTE.
Why the study?
Transthoracic echocardiography has limited sensitivity for detecting mural left ventricular thrombus after acute myocardial infarction, whereas cardiac magnetic resonance offers superior diagnostic capability.
Does contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance improve the detection of left ventricular mural thrombus compared to transthoracic echocardiography in high-risk post-MI patients?
Case Report (n=1)
Does contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance improve the detection of left ventricular mural thrombus compared to transthoracic echocardiography in high-risk post-MI patients?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CMR is superior to non-contrast TTE for detecting LV mural thrombus in high-risk post-MI patients, especially those with concomitant prothrombotic conditions like CML.
Background: Left ventricular (LV) thrombus represents a critical complication following acute myocardial infarction (MI), particularly in patients with reduced LV ejection fraction (LVEF) < 40%, extensive MI, and LV aneurysm. Chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML), a haematological malignancy, is a recognized risk factor for thrombosis. While transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) serves as a 'goalkeeper' for the initial screening modality, its sensitivity in detecting mural thrombi remains limited. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) with gadolinium enhancement has emerged as the diagnostic gold standard due to its superior spatial resolution and ability to recognize thrombus. Case summary: A 47-year-old male with CML, undergoing chemotherapy and a history of extensive anterior ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the proximal left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery, presented with exertional dyspnoea. Although serial non-contrast TTEs over 12 months revealed reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and extensive regional wall motion abnormalities, with pulmonary hypertension (PASP 46 mmHg), no thrombus was detected. Contrast-enhanced CMR identified a large transmural MI involving the anterior, anterolateral walls, and apex with an apical LV mural thrombus. After 3 months of warfarin therapy, the thrombus reduced in size and showed no improvement in LV systolic function (LVEF 36%). Conclusion: CMR is superior to non-contrast TTE in detecting and monitoring LV thrombus treatment. The early CMR should be considered in high-risk patients post MI, particularly in those with concomitant haematological malignancy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nguyen et al. (2025) conducted a case report in Left ventricular mural thrombus post-myocardial infarction with chronic myeloid leukaemia (n=1). Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) vs. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was evaluated on Detection of left ventricular mural thrombus. Contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance successfully identified a large apical left ventricular mural thrombus that had been missed by serial non-contrast transthoracic echocardiograms.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: