This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Rice paddies, a major agricultural source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, require sustainable management to balance increasing grain demand with emissions reduction. Based on a 38-year experiment, this study investigates the combined effects of winter-planted green manure (Chinese milk vetch: Astragalus sinicus L.) and straw mulching on soil properties, rice yield, and GHG emissions in a double rice cropping system. The treatments were: 100 % NPK, reduced NPK with milk vetch (NPK+A), reduced NPK with milk vetch and straw (NPK+A+S), and no fertilizer (CK). Compared to CK, the NPK+A+S, NPK+A, and 100 % NPK treatments significantly improved total nitrogen, available potassium, and rice yields ( p < 0.05). However, the annual methane (CH 4 ) emissions were significantly increased by 162.0 % and 112.1 % in the treatments of 100 % NPK and NPK+A, respectively, but not NPK+A+S, relative to CK ( p > 0.05). Notably, the NPK+A+S treatment significantly outperformed the 100 % NPK treatment, achieving a higher annual rice yield (11.61 t ha −1 vs. 10.77 t ha −1 ) and lower annual CH 4 emissions ( p < 0.05). No marked differences were observed in nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions among the treatments. Together, our findings suggest that the combined application of winter-grown milk vetch and straw mulch can improve rice yield, and reduce CH 4 emissions. • Green manure and straw mulch effects on rice and GHG emissions were studied. • NPK with/without organic amendment improved soil properties and rice yields. • NPK+A+S achieved the highest rice yield and similar methane emissions to CK. • NPK+A+S outperformed 100 % NPK with higher rice yield and lower CH 4 emissions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Raheem et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: